Your Content or No Content – Web 2.0 fights begin!

Update: Should have been more clear in the post. Splashcast’s core product isn’t  100% dependent on third-party video, you can use many media types to create and syndicate your own channel.  It’s pretty cool and pretty powerful stuff.

Techcrunch reports that Grouper, the online video service owned by Sony, issued a C&D today to Searchles.com. Searchles in a Washington D.C. based start-up that is essentially a social search engine that lets you bookmark, tag, etc. things you like. They also show videos leeched from others through their own video player, and thats what caught Grouper’s attention.

There are a ton of start-ups that re-broadcast videos found on YouTube, Revver, etc. but do it through their own skinned video player, removing the originating site’s player functionality, branding, and sometimes even the watermark! It’s the easiest way to get your very own YouTube up and running and without any bandwidth costs because the video hosting and costs stay with the originating site.

Great idea if you aren’t staking a business on it. Bad idea if its your core product. My advice to start-ups is: If the core of your product depends on someone else letting you leech their service then you have no business.

Obviously common sense and not a revelation, but it amazes me at how many companies think that they can sustain a product when they are 100% dependant on someone else letting them use what isn’t theirs. A few examples are AdBrite’s InVideo product, Splashcast, PeekVid, and Cut‘s video editing. Although they are great ideas and services, they are based on leeching video that isn’t theirs. So, unless the hope is of a re-broadcast license from YouTube, then they run the risk of being out of business tomorrow.

Hey, YouTube. Want to make money and get those elusive re-broadcast licenses you need to stay alive? Re-license your content! Your welcome for the thought…now go work out the legal issues 🙂

Advertisements

2 Responses to Your Content or No Content – Web 2.0 fights begin!

  1. Jaafer, I agree that this is an interesting topic. It’s less than central to what SplashCast does though as video hosted elsewhere is just one of many media types our users work with. We also go to great lengths to highlight atribution. Feel free to email me if you have any questions. Thanks!

  2. jhaidar says:

    Thanks Marshall. It’s actually an important qualification and I’ve updated the post to reflect it. Whereas Cuts and PeekVid are heavily dependant, Splashcast is not 100% dependant on third-party video and is actually pretty powerful and cool.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: